[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADUfDZpjFv9Vo1H2rzeCyYo2nsnP_k1prkTCQqTtpk1YjL==zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 11:25:31 -0700
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 4:01 PM Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com> wrote:
>
> Explain the restrictions imposed on ublk servers in two cases:
> 1. When UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON is set (current ublk_drv)
> 2. When UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON is not set (legacy)
>
> Remove most references to per-queue daemons, as the new
> UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON feature renders that concept obsolete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists