[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs0tt54r2ao.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 20:57:35 +0200
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, Tudor Ambarus
<tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Miquel
Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "open list:SPI NOR SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec,spi-nor: Add atmel,at26*
compatible string
On Wed, May 28 2025, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 06:13:22PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23 2025, Frank Li wrote:
>>
>> > Add atmel,at26* compatible string to fix below CHECK_DTB warning:
>> >
>> > arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/vf/vf610-twr.dtb: /soc/bus@...00000/spi@...2c000/at26df081a@0:
>> > failed to match any schema with compatible: ['atmel,at26df081a']
>>
>> Is there any problem with setting the compatible to "jedec,spi-nor" in
>> the DTS instead? If not, it would better to do that instead.
>
> I suppose it should work. But it is quite old legancy boards. I have not
> board to test it. And dt also prefer add chip specific compatible string
> before common failback compatible string in case need workaround some chip
> issues.
Hmm, poking around with old DTs is probably not a good idea. Anyway, the
flash is listed in spi_nor_dev_ids just like the others in this yaml, so
this patch looks fine.
Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists