[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4df97d81-cbea-4fad-66a5-28202903775f@applied-asynchrony.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 08:07:33 +0200
From: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eventpoll: Fix priority inversion problem
On 2025-05-28 07:57, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> It seems the condition (!n) in __ep_remove is not always true and the WARN_ON triggers.
This should of course read "not always false", sorry.
-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists