[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250528093005.486a6fdbaae7976430680baf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 09:30:05 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Simplify reset_disabled_cpu_buffer() with
use of guard()
On Tue, 27 May 2025 14:46:23 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> Use guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)() in reset_disabled_cpu_buffer() to
> simplify the locking.
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 10a4b26929ae..0b21d64e90c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -6112,21 +6112,16 @@ rb_reset_cpu(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> /* Must have disabled the cpu buffer then done a synchronize_rcu */
> static void reset_disabled_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> + guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
>
> if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, local_read(&cpu_buffer->committing)))
> - goto out;
> + return;
>
> arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
>
> rb_reset_cpu(cpu_buffer);
>
> arch_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
> -
> - out:
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.47.2
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists