[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276FD88B84112B9807DA0238C67A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 08:11:06 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
CC: "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "bagasdotme@...il.com"
<bagasdotme@...il.com>, "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>, "thierry.reding@...il.com"
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "shuah@...nel.org"
<shuah@...nel.org>, "jsnitsel@...hat.com" <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
"nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"mshavit@...gle.com" <mshavit@...gle.com>, "praan@...gle.com"
<praan@...gle.com>, "zhangzekun11@...wei.com" <zhangzekun11@...wei.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "mochs@...dia.com" <mochs@...dia.com>,
"alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com" <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>, "vasant.hegde@....com"
<vasant.hegde@....com>, "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 03/29] iommu: Apply the new iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd
helper
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2025 5:35 AM
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:49:40AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 11:21 AM
> > >
> > > Now the new ucmd-based object allocator eases the finalize/abort
> routine,
> > > apply this to all existing allocators that aren't protected by any lock.
> > >
> > > Upgrade the for-driver vIOMMU alloctor too, and pass down to all
> existing
> > > viommu_alloc op accordingly.
> > >
> > > Note that __iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd() builds in some static tests that
> > > cover both static_asserts in the iommufd_viommu_alloc(). Thus drop
> them.
> >
> > I may overlook something, but at a quick glance the following check
> > Is not covered?
> >
> > - static_assert(__same_type(struct iommufd_viommu,
> \
> > - ((drv_struct *)NULL)->member));
> \
>
> The container_of() inside __iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd() covers that:
>
> #define container_of(ptr, type, member) ({ \
> void *__mptr = (void *)(ptr); \
> static_assert(__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) || \
> <<== here
> __same_type(*(ptr), void), \
> "pointer type mismatch in container_of()"); \
> ((type *)(__mptr - offsetof(type, member))); })
Yeah it's there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists