[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8bb97cc-68b6-44f1-a4f4-b0ebc42a7f92@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 11:09:32 +0200
From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Specify access type of bpf_sysctl_get_name args
On 27/05/2025 21:56, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 5/27/25 9:54 AM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>> The second argument of bpf_sysctl_get_name() helper is a pointer to a
>> buffer that is being written to. However that isn't specify in the
>> prototype.
>>
>> Until commit 37cce22dbd51a ("bpf: verifier: Refactor helper access
>> type tracking"), all helper accesses were considered as a possible
>> write access by the verifier, so no big harm was done. However, since
>> then, the verifier might make wrong asssumption about the content of
>> that address which might lead it to make faulty optimizations (such as
>> removing code that was wrongly labeled dead). This is what happens in
>
> Could you give more detailed example about the above statement?
>
> the verifier might make wrong asssumption about the content of
> that address which might lead it to make faulty optimizations (such as
> removing code that was wrongly labeled dead)
To be clear, I don't mean that the verifier does anything wrong in this
case. It makes a wrong assumption because it was fed wrong information
by the helper prototype. Here is the output of the verifier with commit
37cce22dbd51a:
func#0 @0
Live regs before insn:
0: .1........ (bf) r7 = r10
1: .1.....7.. (07) r7 += -8
2: .1.....7.. (b7) r0 = 0
3: 01.....7.. (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r0
4: .1.....7.. (bf) r2 = r7
5: .12....7.. (b7) r3 = 8
6: .123...7.. (b7) r4 = 1
7: .1234..7.. (85) call bpf_sysctl_get_name#101
8: 0......7.. (55) if r0 != 0x7 goto pc+6
9: .......7.. (18) r8 = 0x6d656d5f706374
11: .......78. (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)
12: ........89 (5d) if r8 != r9 goto pc+2
13: .......... (b7) r0 = 1
14: 0......... (05) goto pc+1
15: .......... (b7) r0 = 0
16: 0......... (95) exit
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
0: (bf) r7 = r10 ; R7_w=fp0 R10=fp0
1: (07) r7 += -8 ; R7_w=fp-8
2: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r0 ; R0_w=0 R7_w=fp-8 fp-8_w=0
4: (bf) r2 = r7 ; R2_w=fp-8 R7_w=fp-8
5: (b7) r3 = 8 ; R3_w=8
6: (b7) r4 = 1 ; R4_w=1
7: (85) call bpf_sysctl_get_name#101
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 7 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 6: (b7) r4 = 1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 5: (b7) r3 = 8
8: R0_w=scalar()
8: (55) if r0 != 0x7 goto pc+6 ; R0_w=7
9: (18) r8 = 0x6d656d5f706374 ; R8_w=0x6d656d5f706374
11: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0) ; R7=fp-8 R9=0 fp-8=0
12: (5d) if r8 != r9 goto pc+2
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 12 first_idx 12 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r8 stack=: R0_w=7 R7_w=fp-8 R8_rw=P0x6d656d5f706374 R9_rw=0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=0
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 11 first_idx 0 subseq_idx 12
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r8 stack= before 11: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r8 stack= before 9: (18) r8 = 0x6d656d5f706374
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 12 first_idx 12 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r9 stack=: R0_w=7 R7_w=fp-8 R8_rw=P0x6d656d5f706374 R9_rw=P0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=0
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 11 first_idx 0 subseq_idx 12
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r9 stack= before 11: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 9: (18) r8 = 0x6d656d5f706374
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 8: (55) if r0 != 0x7 goto pc+6
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 7: (85) call bpf_sysctl_get_name#101
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 6: (b7) r4 = 1
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 5: (b7) r3 = 8
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 4: (bf) r2 = r7
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r0
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 2: (b7) r0 = 0
12: R8=0x6d656d5f706374 R9=0
15: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
16: (95) exit
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 16 first_idx 12 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 15: (b7) r0 = 0
from 8 to 15: R0_w=scalar() R7_w=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=0
15: R0_w=scalar() R7_w=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=0
15: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
16: (95) exit
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 16 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 15: (b7) r0 = 0
processed 16 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1
At line 11, it still assume that fp-8=0, despite the call to
bpf_sysctl_get_name. Because of that, it assumes that the first branch
of the conditional jump at line 12 is never taken an the program always
return 0 (access denied).
For comparison, here's the verifier output when commit 37cce22dbd51a is
reverted:
func#0 @0
Live regs before insn:
0: .1........ (bf) r7 = r10
1: .1.....7.. (07) r7 += -8
2: .1.....7.. (b7) r0 = 0
3: 01.....7.. (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r0
4: .1.....7.. (bf) r2 = r7
5: .12....7.. (b7) r3 = 8
6: .123...7.. (b7) r4 = 1
7: .1234..7.. (85) call bpf_sysctl_get_name#101
8: 0......7.. (55) if r0 != 0x7 goto pc+6
9: .......7.. (18) r8 = 0x6d656d5f706374
11: .......78. (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)
12: ........89 (5d) if r8 != r9 goto pc+2
13: .......... (b7) r0 = 1
14: 0......... (05) goto pc+1
15: .......... (b7) r0 = 0
16: 0......... (95) exit
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
0: (bf) r7 = r10 ; R7_w=fp0 R10=fp0
1: (07) r7 += -8 ; R7_w=fp-8
2: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r0 ; R0_w=0 R7_w=fp-8 fp-8_w=0
4: (bf) r2 = r7 ; R2_w=fp-8 R7_w=fp-8
5: (b7) r3 = 8 ; R3_w=8
6: (b7) r4 = 1 ; R4_w=1
7: (85) call bpf_sysctl_get_name#101
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 7 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 6: (b7) r4 = 1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 5: (b7) r3 = 8
8: R0_w=scalar()
8: (55) if r0 != 0x7 goto pc+6 ; R0_w=7
9: (18) r8 = 0x6d656d5f706374 ; R8_w=0x6d656d5f706374
11: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0) ; R7=fp-8 R9=scalar() fp-8=mmmmmmmm
12: (5d) if r8 != r9 goto pc+2 ; R8=0x6d656d5f706374 R9=0x6d656d5f706374
13: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=1
14: (05) goto pc+1
16: (95) exit
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 16 first_idx 12 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 14: (05) goto pc+1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 13: (b7) r0 = 1
from 12 to 15: R0=7 R7=fp-8 R8=0x6d656d5f706374 R9=scalar() R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
15: R0=7 R7=fp-8 R8=0x6d656d5f706374 R9=scalar() R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
15: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
16: (95) exit
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 16 first_idx 12 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 15: (b7) r0 = 0
from 8 to 15: R0_w=scalar() R7_w=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
15: R0_w=scalar() R7_w=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
15: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
16: (95) exit
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 16 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 15: (b7) r0 = 0
processed 19 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1
>
> This patch actually may cause a behavior change.
>
> Without this patch, typically the whole buffer will be initialized
> to 0 and then the helper itself will copy bytes until seeing a '\0'.
>
> With this patch, bpf prog does not need to initialize the buffer.
> Inside the helper, the copied bytes may not cover the whole buffer.
If that's an issue, it could be easily fixed by replacing
ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM by ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_WRITE.
I don't know what the original intention was when bpf_sysctl_get_name()
was introduced, but almost all helpers use ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM for
such a case.
Jerome
>
>> test_sysctl selftest to the tests related to sysctl_get_name.
>>
>> Correctly mark the second argument of bpf_sysctl_get_name() as
>> ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
>> index 84f58f3d028a3..09c02a592d24a 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
>> @@ -2104,7 +2104,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto
>> bpf_sysctl_get_name_proto = {
>> .gpl_only = false,
>> .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
>> .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
>> - .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
>> + .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
>> .arg3_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE,
>> .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
>> };
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists