[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5853f5f8-004a-4107-acbf-31986150308a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:25:35 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@...il.com>
Cc: ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, lossin@...nel.org,
a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust/list: replace unwrap() with ? in doctest examples
On 5/27/25 10:49 PM, Albin Babu Varghese wrote:
> Using `unwrap()` in kernel doctests can cause panics on error and may
> give newcomers the mistaken impression that panicking is acceptable
> in kernel code.
>
> Replace all `.unwrap()` calls in `kernel::list`
> examples with `.ok_or(EINVAL)?` so that errors are properly propagated.
>
> Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1164
> Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1164
> Signed-off-by: Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists