[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250528103453.GF31726@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:34:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
laokz <laokz@...mail.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>,
Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>,
Fazla Mehrab <a.mehrab@...edance.com>,
Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 32/62] objtool: Suppress section skipping warnings
with --dryrun
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:52:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 01:16:56PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > It's common to use --dryrun on binaries that have already been
> > processed. Don't print the section skipping warnings in that case.
>
> Ah, I rather like this warning, it gives me an easy check to see if the
> file has already been processed.
>
> I typically do a OBJTOOL_ARGS="--backup" build and run dryrun debug
> sessions against those .orig files.
Turns out, you already broke this.. :-(
I'm now having a case where objtool fails on vmlinux.o and make happily
deletes vmlinux.o and I'm left empty handed.
Let me go resurrect --backup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists