[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DA8WPLS2R7K3.2T94MJM71BXI0@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 21:54:56 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Miguel Ojeda"
<ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
<gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor
Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Jens
Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Fiona Behrens" <me@...enk.dev>, "Christian
Schrefl" <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] change blanket impls for `[Pin]Init` and add one
for `Result<T, E>`
On Thu May 29, 2025 at 9:11 PM CEST, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:10:24AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> Remove the error from the blanket implementations `impl<T, E> Init<T, E>
>> for T` (and also for `PinInit`). Add implementations for `Result<T, E>`.
>>
>> This allows one to easily construct (un)conditional failing
>> initializers. It also improves the compatibility with APIs that do not
>> use pin-init, because users can supply a `Result<T, E>` to a function
>> taking an `impl PinInit<T, E>`.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
>> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/62/commits/58612514b256c6f4a4a0718be25298410e67387a
>> [ Also fix a compile error in block. - Benno ]
>> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>
>
> The patch title is missing a "rust:" tag... but you can fix that in PR.
Good catch, I originally ported this patch with my script, but then I
decided to squash upstream and then copied the commit message from
there, removing the prefix...
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Thanks!
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists