[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kmGPF+MmYcYmPz93g5L2rr5AspZGYYLfG=gYSfF703+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 15:28:41 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: check type of `$ptr` in `container_of!`
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 4:31 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Add a compile-time check that `*$ptr` is of the type of `$type->$($f)*`.
>
> Suggested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAH5fLgh6gmqGBhPMi2SKn7mCmMWfOSiS0WP5wBuGPYh9ZTAiww@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks!
[ I went with v1, since it seems to me like the obvious approach, the
error messages seemed good enough and the debug performance should be
fine, given the kernel is always built with -O2. Moreover, we could
move the function out of this -- see [1]:
With v1, we could also just put `assert_same_type` outside as a
utility for others to use, i.e. in the `kernel` crate, which
simplifies things and makes the error a bit shorter. Moving the
function out makes the error slightly shorter, would also allow us to
document its usage, including the suggestion to use `if false` in an
example.
Regarding the `if false`, the kernel is always built with at least
-O2. Benno mentioned debug performance -- was that related to
something like debug assertions being enabled or just optimization
level? Either way, even with the assertions enabled, I don't see it in
codegen.
In particular, the error message for a example mistake like the one
showcased by Tamir in v2 and v3:
diff --git a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
index 8d978c896747..6a7089149878 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ fn raw_entry(&mut self, key: &K) ->
RawEntry<'_, K, V> {
while !(*child_field_of_parent).is_null() {
let curr = *child_field_of_parent;
// SAFETY: All links fields we create are in a
`Node<K, V>`.
- let node = unsafe { container_of!(curr, Node<K,
V>, links) };
+ let node = unsafe { container_of!(curr, Node<K,
V>, key) };
// SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is
valid by the type invariants.
match key.cmp(unsafe { &(*node).key }) {
looks like this (plus more details):
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> rust/kernel/lib.rs:219:32
|
219 | assert_same_type($ptr,
::core::ptr::addr_of!((*container).$($f)*).cast_mut());
| ----------------
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `*mut
rb_node`, found `*mut K`
| |
| arguments to this function are incorrect
- Miguel ]
[ Fixed `mem` -> `ptr`. - Miguel ]
This caught three cases that require an extra cast in -next -- those
will be fixed on merge.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists