[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDh9BfyNXvJvduDr@agluck-desk3>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 08:28:05 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Zaid Alali <zaidal@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, bp@...en8.de,
robert.moore@...el.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, Benjamin.Cheatham@....com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, arnd@...db.de, Avadhut.Naik@....com,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, john.allen@....com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/9] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Add einjv2 extension struct
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:38:54AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 02:38:10PM -0700, Zaid Alali wrote:
> > struct set_error_type_with_address {
> > u32 type;
> > u32 vendor_extension;
> > @@ -58,6 +80,7 @@ struct set_error_type_with_address {
> > u64 memory_address;
> > u64 memory_address_range;
> > u32 pcie_sbdf;
> > + struct einjv2_extension_struct einjv2_struct;
>
> I can't make this match up with the ACPI v6.5 spec. The spec defines
> a whole new EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE data structure in table 18.34 that
> is NOT just a simple addition of new fields at the end of the existing
> SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS data structure. E.g. the "flags" are now
> in a 3-byte field at offset 5 instead of a 4-byte field at offset 8.
> There is a new "length" field that descibes the total size of the
> structure including the new flex array of syndrome values at the
> end.
Someone pointed me to the ACPI 6.5 Errata A spec: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5_A/
This code does match with the description there.
I'll continue looking at your patches with this as the reference.
Please make sure to reference this spec directly (not buried in links
to tianocore bugzilla entries) when you post next version.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists