[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250529185913.25091-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 11:59:13 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] crypto: s390/sha256 - rename module to sha256-s390
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
When the s390 SHA-256 code is built as a loadable module, name it
sha256-s390.ko instead of sha256.ko. This avoids a module name
collision with crypto/sha256.ko and makes it consistent with the other
architectures.
We should consider making a single module provide all the SHA-256
library code, which would prevent issues like this. But for now this is
the fix that's needed.
Fixes: b9eac03edcf8 ("crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash")
Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250529110526.6d2959a9.alex.williamson@redhat.com/
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
---
arch/s390/lib/crypto/Makefile | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/crypto/Makefile b/arch/s390/lib/crypto/Makefile
index 920197967f463..5df30f1e79307 100644
--- a/arch/s390/lib/crypto/Makefile
+++ b/arch/s390/lib/crypto/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CHACHA_S390) += chacha_s390.o
chacha_s390-y := chacha-glue.o chacha-s390.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256_S390) += sha256.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256_S390) += sha256-s390.o
+sha256-s390-y := sha256.o
base-commit: e0797d3b91de75b6c95b4a0e0649ebd4aac1d9d1
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists