[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250530-squatting-chatroom-230f035f18ef@spud>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 17:41:16 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
Rahul Pathak <rpathak@...tanamicro.com>,
Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/23] dt-bindings: clock: Add RPMI clock service
controller bindings
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 02:16:56PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the RPMI clock service group based
> controller for the supervisor software.
>
> The RPMI clock service group is defined by the RISC-V platform
> management interface (RPMI) specification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/clock/riscv,rpmi-clock.yaml | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/riscv,rpmi-clock.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/riscv,rpmi-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/riscv,rpmi-clock.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9c672a38595a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/riscv,rpmi-clock.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/riscv,rpmi-clock.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: RISC-V RPMI clock service group based clock controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> +
> +description: |
> + The RISC-V Platform Management Interface (RPMI) [1] defines a
> + messaging protocol which is modular and extensible. The supervisor
> + software can send/receive RPMI messages via SBI MPXY extension [2]
> + or some dedicated supervisor-mode RPMI transport.
> +
> + The RPMI specification [1] defines clock service group for accessing
> + system clocks managed by a platform microcontroller. The supervisor
> + software can access RPMI clock service group via SBI MPXY channel or
> + some dedicated supervisor-mode RPMI transport.
> +
> + ===========================================
> + References
> + ===========================================
> +
> + [1] RISC-V Platform Management Interface (RPMI)
> + https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-rpmi/releases
> +
> + [2] RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI)
> + https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/releases
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + description:
> + Intended for use by the supervisor software.
> + const: riscv,rpmi-clock
> +
> + mboxes:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + Mailbox channel of the underlying RPMI transport or SBI message proxy channel.
> +
> + "#clock-cells":
> + const: 1
Could you please add some description here as to what this clock-cell
actually does? On a normal clock controller someone might cite an
include file with a huge list of defines for what numbers map to what
clock. In this case, this value is CLOCK_ID in the spec, so it's
completely platform specific as to what they mean so citing some include
isn't helpful, so just mention that it is CLOCK_ID and the meanings are
platform specific.
I suppose technically it can be something other than CLOCK_ID, if this is
used when the SBI message proxy extension is provided by an SBI
implementation that uses a non-RPMI transport, but I don't think that's a
can of worms worth bringing up in the binding. Anyone doing that can put
2+2 together I think.
Otherwise, the bindings are all:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cheers,
Conor.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - mboxes
> + - "#clock-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + clock-controller {
> + compatible = "riscv,rpmi-clock";
> + mboxes = <&mpxy_mbox 0x1000 0x0>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +...
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists