[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250530164431.GB7758@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 17:44:31 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the mfd tree
On Mon, 26 May 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> 0ffcf5f1e41c ("dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: Add compatible for ipq5018")
>
> This is commit
>
> 1d2c5d5f3f44 ("dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: Add compatible for ipq5018")
>
> in the arm-soc tree.
Why is this patch in the arm-soc tree?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists