[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202505301151.6CEDBBF8@keescook>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 11:52:45 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3][next] overflow: Fix direct struct member
initialization in _DEFINE_FLEX()
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:06:01AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> #define __DEFINE_FLEX(type, name, member, count, trailer...) \
> _Static_assert(__builtin_constant_p(count), \
> "onstack flex array members require compile-time const count"); \
> union { \
> u8 bytes[struct_size_t(type, member, count)]; \
> type obj; \
> } name##_u trailer; \
> type *name = (type *)&name##_u
>
> #define _DEFINE_FLEX(type, name, member, count, initializer...) \
> __DEFINE_FLEX(type, name, member, count, = { .obj = initializer })
> [...]
> Does that look like what you'd want? (Note I didn't actually build this;
> I want to make sure the concept is workable...)
FWIW, this is working as expected: https://godbolt.org/z/P7Go8Tr33
I'll send a proper patch...
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists