lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <txhlqciq5zd4uilon3cnt7ao6as3llle3oachgudzfj5bka577@6mteq4zsvj34>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 08:43:04 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>, 
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Krzysztof Wilczy??ski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, 
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/pwrctrl: Skip creating platform device unless
 CONFIG_PCI_PWRCTL enabled

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 05:25:22PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 02:21:04PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 08:29:46AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 09:42:07PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > What I would prefer is something like the first paragraph in that
> > > > section: the #ifdef in a header file that declares the function and
> > > > defines a no-op stub, with the implementation in some pwrctrl file.
> > > 
> > > pci_pwrctrl_create_device() is static, but it is possible to #ifdef
> > > the whole function in the .c file and provide the stub in an #else
> > > branch.  That's easier to follow than #ifdef'ing portions of the
> > > function.
> > > 
> > 
> > +1
> 
> I dropped the ball here and didn't get any fix for this in v6.15.
> 

That's unfortunate. Let's try to get it backported through stable list.

> Why do we need pci_pwrctrl_create_device() in drivers/pci/probe.c?
> The obvious thing would have been to put the implementation in
> drivers/pci/pwrctrl with a stub in drivers/pci/pci.h, so I assume
> there's some reason we can't do that?

I assumed initially that pwrctrl dependency would always be there with PCI core.
Since now it is clear that we need to build the function conditionally, we could
move it to drivers/pci/pwrctrl/core.c with stub in drivers/pci/pci.h.

I will submit a patch for that.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ