linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/13] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup: Disable "mcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <62c3a4e6-ffa3-4fc4-a0b1-c8b4bbec684b@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 10:26:28 +0530
From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <srk@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup: Disable
 "mcu_cpsw" in the SoC file

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 03:38:10PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/05/2025 15:34, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > Following the existing convention of disabling nodes in the SoC file and
> > enabling only the required ones in the board file, disable "mcu_cpsw" node.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> Really all of this is fake split. One line per commit.

I split the patches into Board and SoC specific changes. I was following
the split used when we add new device-tree nodes:
- Add the node to SoC file in the first commit
- Enable it in the Board file in the next commit

Since this is a cleanup, the above split may not be required and I
understand that. I will squash the changes in the next version of this
series.

Thank you for your feedback.

Regards,
Siddharth.