linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kdump: crashkernel reservation from CMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aDl1ViMpK_6q_z06@tiehlicka>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 11:07:34 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	Philipp Rudo <prudo@...hat.com>, Pingfan Liu <piliu@...hat.com>,
	Tao Liu <ltao@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kdump: crashkernel reservation from CMA

On Fri 30-05-25 10:39:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.05.25 10:28, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > All that being said I would go with an additional parameter to the
> > kdump cma setup - e.g. cma_sane_dma that would skip waiting and use 10s
> > otherwise. That would make the optimized behavior opt in, we do not need
> > to support all sorts of timeouts and also learn if this is not
> > sufficient.
> > 
> > Makes sense?
> 
> Just so I understand correctly, you mean extending the "crashkernel=" option
> with a boolean parameter? If set, e.g., wait 1s, otherwise magic number 10?

crashkernel=1G,cma,cma_sane_dma # no wait on transition
crashkernel=1G,cma # wait on transition with e.g. 10s timeout
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs