[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <473e974b-39a1-4ee1-b321-58f6a74c0155@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 11:42:49 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
willy@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com, hch@....de,
zhang.lyra@...il.com, debug@...osinc.com, bjorn@...nel.org,
balbirs@...dia.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, John@...ves.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] mm/pagewalk: Skip dax pages in pagewalk
On 29.05.25 08:32, Alistair Popple wrote:
> Previously dax pages were skipped by the pagewalk code as pud_special() or
> vm_normal_page{_pmd}() would be false for DAX pages. Now that dax pages are
> refcounted normally that is no longer the case, so add explicit checks to
> skip them.
Is this really what we want, though? If these are now just "normal"
pages, they shall be handled as being normal.
I would assume that we want to check that in the callers instead.
E.g., in get_mergeable_page() we already have a folio_is_zone_device()
check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memremap.h | 11 +++++++++++
> mm/pagewalk.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> index 4aa1519..54e8b57 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,17 @@ static inline bool folio_is_fsdax(const struct folio *folio)
> return is_fsdax_page(&folio->page);
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_devdax_page(const struct page *page)
> +{
> + return is_zone_device_page(page) &&
> + page_pgmap(page)->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool folio_is_devdax(const struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + return is_devdax_page(&folio->page);
> +}
Hm, nobody uses folio_is_devdax() in this patch :)
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists