linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kdump: crashkernel reservation from CMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aDmAO7Hd30PtCD33@tiehlicka>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 11:54:03 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
	Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	Philipp Rudo <prudo@...hat.com>, Pingfan Liu <piliu@...hat.com>,
	Tao Liu <ltao@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kdump: crashkernel reservation from CMA

On Fri 30-05-25 11:47:46, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.05.25 11:34, Jiri Bohac wrote:
[...]
> > I am inclined to just setting the fixed delay to 10s for now and
> > adding a sysfs knob later if someone asks for it.
> > 
> > Would that work for you?
> 
> Sure. We could always add such a flag later if it's really a problem for
> someone.

Yes, no objection with the most conservative approach first.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs