[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250530-those-frequency-f8106275769f@spud>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 16:24:51 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
"open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: dma: fsl-mxs-dma: allow interrupt-names
for fsl,imx23-dma-apbx
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:50:42AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 04:28:07PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 05:32:52PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Allow interrupt-names for fsl,imx23-dma-apbx and keep the same restriction
> > > for others.
> >
> > The content of the patch seems okay, but why are you doing this? What is
> > the value on this particular platform but not the others?
>
> Actually it is not used in dma driver, i.MX23 is quite old chips (over 10year).
If they provide no value, why not just delete them?
> Just to match existed dts to reduce warnings.
You should mention this in your commit message.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists