linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: increase max amount of device functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23957563.6Emhk5qWAg@diego>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 14:59:17 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
 William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>,
 Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
 Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
 Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
 Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
 Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>,
 Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: increase max amount of device
 functions

Am Dienstag, 8. April 2025, 14:32:13 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Nicolas Frattaroli:
> With the introduction of the RK3576, the maximum device function ID used
> increased to 14, as anyone can easily verify for themselves with:
> 
>   rg -g '*-pinctrl.dtsi' '<\d+\s+RK_P..\s+(?<func>\d+)\s.*>;$' --trim \
>   -NI -r '$func' arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/ | sort -g | uniq
> 
> Unfortunately, this wasn't caught by dt-validate as those pins are
> omit-if-no-ref and we had no reference to them in any tree so far.
> 
> Once again kick the can down the road by increasing the limit to 14.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>