[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025053128-profound-importer-8436@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 07:52:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Vankar, Chintan" <c-vankar@...com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
s-vadapalli@...com, danishanwar@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Extend mmio-mux driver to configure mux with
new DT property
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 10:35:24PM +0530, Vankar, Chintan wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> I have tried to implement Timesync Router node to the suitable
> Subsystems (Interrupt controller and Mux-controller). Thomas
> has provided a feedback with a reason why Timesync Router is not
> suitable for irqchip. But I didn't get a proper feedback for mux-
> controller subsystem.
What do you mean "proper feedback"?
> Can you please help me deciding in which subsystem I should implement
> it, if not mux-controller can it go in drivers/misc ?
Why not mux? What's preventing that from happening? Why would misc be
better?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists