linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] x86/fred, KVM: VMX: Pass event data to the FRED entry point from KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e6cb58cd-bd0e-4453-adf1-126a4b830b96@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 13:45:02 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Xin Li <xin@...or.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "Thomas
 Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "Borislav
 Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "Peter
 Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"Kan Liang" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Andrew
 Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, "Kirill A . Shutemov"
	<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@...ux.microsoft.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, "Sandipan
 Das" <sandipan.das@....com>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] x86/fred, KVM: VMX: Pass event data to the FRED
 entry point from KVM

On 5/15/2025 6:15 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2025, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>> On 5/14/2025 7:15 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Compile tested only...
>>>
>>
>> No worries. I'll test it out. I am assuming you want this patch to go as
>> part of this series.
> 
> Yes please.  I can also post it separately, but that seems unnecessary.

The proposed pre-patch works fine. I'll include in the next revision
along with minor changes to patch 1.

Wondering if there is any feedback for the rest of the patches 2-9? They
haven't received any comments and stay unmodified even with the new
pre-patch.

Thanks,
Sohil