[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250601232937.3510379-83-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 19:29:15 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: patches@...ts.linux.dev,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
brgl@...ev.pl,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 083/102] gpio: grgpio: Make irq_chip immutable
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
[ Upstream commit a30be40bf1d4437646b6885e7e4e71530e6f82c1 ]
Kernel warns about mutable irq_chips:
"not an immutable chip, please consider fixing!"
Constify grgpio_irq_chip, flag the irq_chip as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the
new helper functions, and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250509-gpio-v1-2-639377c98288@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
Now let me analyze this commit against stable backporting criteria:
**YES** ## Analysis: ### 1. Bug Fix Nature This commit fixes a kernel
warning about mutable irq_chips with the message "not an immutable chip,
please consider fixing!" This is clearly a bug fix that addresses a
runtime warning that affects users. ### 2. Code Changes Analysis The
changes are minimal and well-contained within the grgpio driver: -
**Line 173**: Added `gpiochip_disable_irq(&priv->gc, d->hwirq);` call in
`grgpio_irq_mask()` function - **Line 183**: Added
`gpiochip_enable_irq(&priv->gc, d->hwirq);` call in
`grgpio_irq_unmask()` function - **Line 191**: Made `grgpio_irq_chip`
struct `const` (immutable) - **Lines 196-197**: Added
`IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE` flag and `GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS` macro ###
3. Pattern Consistency with Similar Commits This commit follows the
exact same pattern as the approved backport commits in the reference
examples: - **Similar to gpio-104-idio-16** (Status: YES): Same pattern
of making irq_chip const, adding IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE flag, and adding
gpiochip_enable/disable_irq calls - **Similar to gpio-vf610** (Status:
YES): Identical changes - const irq_chip, IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, and proper
helper function calls - **Similar to gpio-104-dio-48e** (Status: YES):
Same transformation pattern ### 4. Risk Assessment - **Low Risk**:
Changes are mechanical transformations following established GPIO
subsystem patterns - **No Architectural Changes**: The commit doesn't
modify core logic, just adapts to new GPIO framework requirements -
**Well-Tested Pattern**: This exact change pattern has been applied
across multiple GPIO drivers successfully ### 5. Stable Tree Compliance
- **Important Bug Fix**: Eliminates kernel warnings that users encounter
- **Minimal Risk**: The changes follow well-established patterns already
proven in other GPIO drivers - **Contained Changes**: All modifications
are within a single driver file with no cross-subsystem impact - **No
New Features**: This is purely a compliance fix for the GPIO framework
requirements ### 6. Framework Compliance The commit brings the grgpio
driver into compliance with the modern GPIO framework's requirements for
immutable irq_chips, which is a necessary change to prevent kernel
warnings and ensure proper resource management. The changes are
essential for maintaining driver functionality in current kernels and
preventing user-visible warnings, making this an ideal candidate for
stable tree backporting.
drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
index 169f33c41c592..7902bd8786977 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
@@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ static void grgpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
grgpio_set_imask(priv, offset, 0);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
+
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(&priv->gc, d->hwirq);
}
static void grgpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static void grgpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
int offset = d->hwirq;
unsigned long flags;
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(&priv->gc, d->hwirq);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
grgpio_set_imask(priv, offset, 1);
@@ -184,11 +187,13 @@ static void grgpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
-static struct irq_chip grgpio_irq_chip = {
+static const struct irq_chip grgpio_irq_chip = {
.name = "grgpio",
.irq_mask = grgpio_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = grgpio_irq_unmask,
.irq_set_type = grgpio_irq_set_type,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+ GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
};
static irqreturn_t grgpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists