linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: watchdog: qcom-wdt: Document qcom,imem property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d3dcf4b8-18eb-4621-9999-bfcd0a5f47b9@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 09:44:03 +0530
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck
 <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: watchdog: qcom-wdt: Document
 qcom,imem property


On 6/1/2025 9:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/05/2025 19:16, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> Krzysztof, Based on the discussions from the previous versions, I have made the changes. Can you help to guide me on how to handle this? Should I just name the property as "sram" and point to the sub block in the IMEM region like how it is done at [1][2], which is more or like similar to what I have submitted in V1 of this series[3] Or is the current approach acceptable? Or some other way to handle this?
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250523-topic-ipa_imem-v1-1-b5d536291c7f@oss.qualcomm.com/T/#u
>>>
>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250523-topic-ipa_imem-v1-2-b5d536291c7f@oss.qualcomm.com/T/#u
>>>
>>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250408-wdt_reset_reason-v1-0-e6ec30c2c926@oss.qualcomm.com/
>> Let's go with desired-value-in-dt here.. I don't trust the firmware
>> to never change. `sram` is prooobably fine, let's hear from Krzysztof
>>
> I propose to go with 'sram' property.

Thanks Konrad and Krzysztof for the inputs. Let rename the property 
qcom,imem to sram and submit the next version.

Thanks,

Kathiravan T.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof