[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c585e338-22eb-42f1-b8a9-adeefe14f374@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 09:41:53 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaraman.narayanamurthy@....qualcomm.com>,
David Collins <david.collins@....qualcomm.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@....qualcomm.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: x1*: Remove
qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink fallback
On 30/05/2025 09:35, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
>
> The "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink" is not longer a fallback compatible
> string of "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", so remove "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink"
No, it still is.
> in x1* platform pmic-glink device nodes.
No explanation, no reasoning and this affects users of this DTS.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists