lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93434285-ebef-4039-9a7a-e5786fd8bcd2@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:17:04 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Russ Weight
 <russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
 Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>,
 Marco Felsch <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: input: Add TouchNetix axiom
 touchscreen

On 30/05/2025 10:45, Marco Felsch wrote:
>>> +
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  reset-gpios:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  panel: true
>>
>> So that was the reason of dropping tag?
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/821ce1d4-bc15-4764-bbe0-315c57e8536e@linaro.org/
>>
>> Anyway, drop the property. Redundant.
> 
> Why is this redundant? The touchscreen.yaml defines it but I need to

It is redundant, because it has ZERO effect. The presence of this
property or lack of it changes nothing. Binding has exactly the same
meaning. Binding behaves exactly the same way in validation/checks. Zero
difference. If there is a difference, please paste checks results.

> request it? At least I understood it that way and all other users of
> this property do it same way. Same is true for all the touchscreen-*

And these users end the binding with additionalProps, right? So that's
the difference.

> properties definied in touchscreen.yaml.
> 
> Regards,
>   Marco


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ