linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/20] gpu: nova-core: wait for GFW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DAC0AJ11ES22.1Y79LA44FCFX7@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 20:21:18 +0900
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Miguel Ojeda"
 <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@...hat.com>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>,
 "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
 "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
 <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
 "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice Ryhl"
 <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "David Airlie"
 <airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>, "Maarten Lankhorst"
 <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@...nel.org>,
 "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "John Hubbard"
 <jhubbard@...dia.com>, "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@...dia.com>, "Joel Fernandes"
 <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, "Timur Tabi" <ttabi@...dia.com>, "Alistair Popple"
 <apopple@...dia.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/20] gpu: nova-core: wait for GFW_BOOT completion

On Sat May 31, 2025 at 11:37 PM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:51 PM Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > TBH - we should really add some safe bindings for sleeps instead of calling
>> > this unsafely, I'd be happy to review them if you do
>> 
>> In case it helps, there is:
>> 
>>     https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250423192857.199712-6-fujita.tomonori@gmail.com/
>> 
>> I think that is the last one -- we have been going back and forth a
>> bit on it (e.g. we had `coarse_sleep()` in the old `rust` pre-merge
>> branch), but, yeah, let's try to get the abstraction(s) in.
>
> We've already discussed this on previous versions of this patch series, where I
> also pointed to the patch series linked above.
>
> I agreed to take this code without waiting for those abstractions, but with a
> TODO to fix things up once they land.

Added the missing TODO for this.