linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix bpf selftest build error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQKWZCu_hgrV6=PMzHizDpJuR+yQjZs4b_=f7MyD2Lip+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 10:50:02 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
Cc: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, "Song, Yoong Siang" <yoong.siang.song@...el.com>, 
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix bpf selftest build error

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:33 AM T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 2:12 AM Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On linux-next, build for bpf selftest displays an error due to
> > mismatch in the expected function signature of bpf_testmod_test_read
> > and bpf_testmod_test_write.
> >
> > Commit 97d06802d10a ("sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of bin_attribute::read/write()")
> > changed the required type for struct bin_attribute to const struct bin_attribute.
> >
> > To resolve the error, update corresponding signature for the callback.
> >
> > Fixes: 97d06802d10a ("sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of bin_attribute::read/write()")
> > Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e915da49-2b9a-4c4c-a34f-877f378129f6@linux.ibm.com/
> > Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >
> > [RESEND]:
> >  - Added Fixes and Tested-by tag.
> >  - Added Greg as receipent for driver-core tree.
> >
> > Original patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250509122348.649064-1-skb99@linux.ibm.com/
> >
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> > index 2e54b95ad898..194c442580ee 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> > @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok;
> >
> >  noinline ssize_t
> >  bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> > -                     struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> > +                     const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> >                       char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
> >  {
> >         struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx ctx = {
> > @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_read, ERRNO);
> >
> >  noinline ssize_t
> >  bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> > -                     struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> > +                     const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> >                       char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
> >  {
> >         struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx ctx = {
> > --
> > 2.43.5
> >
> >
>
> The build is broken in Linus's tree right now. We also now need:
>
> @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static void testmod_unregister_uprobe(void)
>
>  static ssize_t
>  bpf_testmod_uprobe_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> -                        struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> +                        const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
>                          char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
>  {
>
> Should I send a separate patch, or can we update this and get it to Linus?

It was fixed in bpf tree couple days ago.