[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aD8-oZ-Rl8AnXTi_@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:27:45 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Drop sock_cgroup_classid() dummy implementation
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 08:15:34AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 05:45:27PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> > The semantic of returning 0 is unclear when !CONFIG_CGROUP_NET_CLASSID.
> > Since there are no callers of sock_cgroup_classid() with that config
> > anymore we can undefine the helper at all and enforce all (future)
> > callers to handle cases when !CONFIG_CGROUP_NET_CLASSID.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z_52r_v9-3JUzDT7@calendula/
> > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>
> Applied to cgroup/for-6.16-fixes.
Make that for-6.17.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists