[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b89cdc45-39f8-49ac-8b15-d787155393d5@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 11:34:46 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>,
Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: madvise: use walk_page_range_vma() for
madvise_free_single_vma()
On 6/3/25 07:01, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
>
> We've already found the VMA before calling madvise_free_single_vma(),
> so calling walk_page_range() and doing find_vma() again seems
> unnecessary. It also prevents potential optimizations for MADV_FREE
> to use a per-VMA lock.
>
> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>
> Cc: Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@...o.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> ---
> mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index d408ffa404b3..c6a28a2d3ff8 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static int madvise_free_single_vma(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior,
>
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
> - walk_page_range(vma->vm_mm, range.start, range.end,
> + walk_page_range_vma(vma, range.start, range.end,
> &madvise_free_walk_ops, tlb);
> tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
This indeed looks like an improvement dropping a redundant VMA look up
and also opening up potential optimization later using per-VMA lock.
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists