[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWsGVNsm_WdiZ2hNuErrUUaj49SN_ROr-_KfEWW63omTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 09:10:59 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@...hat.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>, Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>,
Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>, Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
Purism Kernel Team <kernel@...i.sm>, Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, Sasha Finkelstein <fnkl.kernel@...il.com>,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/46] panel/orisetech-otm8009a: Use refcounted
allocation in place of devm_kzalloc()
Hi Anusha,
On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 20:28, Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@...hat.com> wrote:
> Move to using the new API devm_drm_panel_alloc() to allocate the
> panel.
>
> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@...hat.com>
Thanks for your patch!
I have a generic comment that applies to all patches in the series.
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c
> @@ -424,9 +424,11 @@ static int otm8009a_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> struct otm8009a *ctx;
> int ret;
>
> - ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
The old code used sizeof(*ctx) instead of an explicit type, for
increased type-safety.
> - if (!ctx)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + ctx = devm_drm_panel_alloc(dev, struct otm8009a, panel,
Can't you use __typeof(*ctx) instead of the explicit type here, too?
> + &otm8009a_drm_funcs,
> + DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx))
> + return PTR_ERR(ctx);
>
> ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> if (IS_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio)) {
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists