linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/28] KVM: x86: Use non-atomic bit ops to manipulate "shadow" MSR intercepts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <89f7a456-dc40-44a8-830e-4ea97ce86638@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 10:53:46 +0800
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Xin Li <xin@...or.com>,
 Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] KVM: x86: Use non-atomic bit ops to manipulate
 "shadow" MSR intercepts


On 5/30/2025 7:39 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Manipulate the MSR bitmaps using non-atomic bit ops APIs (two underscores),
> as the bitmaps are per-vCPU and are only ever accessed while vcpu->mutex is
> held.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 12 ++++++------
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index d5d11cb0c987..b55a60e79a73 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -789,14 +789,14 @@ static void set_shadow_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int read,
>  
>  	/* Set the shadow bitmaps to the desired intercept states */
>  	if (read)
> -		set_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
> +		__set_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
>  	else
> -		clear_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
> +		__clear_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
>  
>  	if (write)
> -		set_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
> +		__set_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
>  	else
> -		clear_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
> +		__clear_bit(slot, svm->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
>  }
>  
>  static bool valid_msr_intercept(u32 index)
> @@ -862,8 +862,8 @@ static void set_msr_interception_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *msrpm,
>  	if (KVM_BUG_ON(offset == MSR_INVALID, vcpu->kvm))
>  		return;
>  
> -	read  ? clear_bit(bit_read,  &tmp) : set_bit(bit_read,  &tmp);
> -	write ? clear_bit(bit_write, &tmp) : set_bit(bit_write, &tmp);
> +	read  ? __clear_bit(bit_read,  &tmp) : __set_bit(bit_read,  &tmp);
> +	write ? __clear_bit(bit_write, &tmp) : __set_bit(bit_write, &tmp);
>  
>  	msrpm[offset] = tmp;
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 9ff00ae9f05a..8f7fe04a1998 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -4029,9 +4029,9 @@ void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type)
>  	idx = vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot(msr);
>  	if (idx >= 0) {
>  		if (type & MSR_TYPE_R)
> -			clear_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
> +			__clear_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
>  		if (type & MSR_TYPE_W)
> -			clear_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
> +			__clear_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
>  	}
>  
>  	if ((type & MSR_TYPE_R) &&
> @@ -4071,9 +4071,9 @@ void vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type)
>  	idx = vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot(msr);
>  	if (idx >= 0) {
>  		if (type & MSR_TYPE_R)
> -			set_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
> +			__set_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.read);
>  		if (type & MSR_TYPE_W)
> -			set_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
> +			__set_bit(idx, vmx->shadow_msr_intercept.write);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (type & MSR_TYPE_R)

Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>