[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63e00cf8-8592-4117-bb27-42bc8c1f8921@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:37:41 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] selftests/mm: Add helper for logging test start
and results
On 27.05.25 18:04, Mark Brown wrote:
> Several of the MM tests have a pattern of printing a description of the
> test to be run then reporting the actual TAP result using a generic string
> not connected to the specific test, often in a shared function used by many
> tests. The name reported typically varies depending on the specific result
> rather than the test too. This causes problems for tooling that works with
> test results, the names reported with the results are used to deduplicate
> tests and track them between runs so both duplicated names and changing
> names cause trouble for things like UIs and automated bisection.
>
> As a first step towards matching these tests better with the expectations
> of kselftest provide helpers which record the test name as part of the
> initial print and then use that as part of reporting a result.
>
> This is not added as a generic kselftest helper partly because the use of
> a variable to store the test name doesn't fit well with the header only
> implementation of kselftest.h and partly because it's not really an
> intended pattern. Ideally at some point the mm tests that use it will be
> updated to not need it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
> index 6effafdc4d8a..4944e4c79051 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <err.h>
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> #include <strings.h> /* ffsl() */
> #include <unistd.h> /* _SC_PAGESIZE */
> #include "../kselftest.h"
> @@ -74,6 +75,25 @@ int uffd_register_with_ioctls(int uffd, void *addr, uint64_t len,
> unsigned long get_free_hugepages(void);
> bool check_vmflag_io(void *addr);
>
> +/* These helpers need to be inline to match the kselftest.h idiom. */
> +static char test_name[1024];
> +
> +static inline void log_test_start(const char *name, ...)
> +{
> + va_list args;
> + va_start(args, name);
> +
> + vsnprintf(test_name, sizeof(test_name), name, args);
> + ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", test_name);
> +
> + va_end(args);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void log_test_result(int result)
> +{
> + ksft_test_result_report(result, "%s\n", test_name);
> +}
Won't win a beauty contest, but should get the job done.
We could allocate the array in log_test_start() and free it in
log_test_result(). Then, we could assert more easily that we always have
a log_test_result() follow exactly one log_test_start() etc.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists