[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ea6e0bf-da88-41a4-b6a0-1b1ee15c8dd0@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:05:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/mm: Fix test result reporting in
gup_longterm
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:36:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.05.25 18:04, Mark Brown wrote:
> > + int result = KSFT_PASS;
> > int ret;
> > + if (fd < 0) {
> > + result = KSFT_FAIL;
> > + goto report;
> > + }
> Not a fan of that, especially as it suddenly converts
> ksft_test_result_skip() -- e.g., on the memfd path -- to KSFT_FAIL.
It looks like the memfd path was an outlier here, the others all failed
if they couldn't allocate the FD.
> Can we just do the log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL/KSFT_SKIP) in the caller?
Nothing stopping that, or doing it for the cases where we want to skip.
IIRC this simplified some of the other callers a little.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists