[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bd6ce0-f900-433b-908c-a77fe85e300b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 21:22:32 +0700
From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez
<eperezma@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] virtio-net: support zerocopy multi
buffer XDP in mergeable
On 6/3/25 09:56, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 8:28 PM Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 5/29/25 12:59, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:19 AM Bui Quang Minh
>>> <minhquangbui99@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> Currently, in zerocopy mode with mergeable receive buffer, virtio-net
>>>> does not support multi buffer but a single buffer only. This commit adds
>>>> support for multi mergeable receive buffer in the zerocopy XDP path by
>>>> utilizing XDP buffer with frags.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>> index e53ba600605a..a9558650f205 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ module_param(napi_tx, bool, 0644);
>>>> #define VIRTIO_XDP_TX BIT(0)
>>>> #define VIRTIO_XDP_REDIR BIT(1)
>>>>
>>>> +#define VIRTNET_MAX_ZC_SEGS 8
>>>> +
>>>> /* RX packet size EWMA. The average packet size is used to determine the packet
>>>> * buffer size when refilling RX rings. As the entire RX ring may be refilled
>>>> * at once, the weight is chosen so that the EWMA will be insensitive to short-
>>>> @@ -1232,65 +1234,53 @@ static void xsk_drop_follow_bufs(struct net_device *dev,
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static int xsk_append_merge_buffer(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>>> - struct receive_queue *rq,
>>>> - struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>>>> - u32 num_buf,
>>>> - struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr,
>>>> - struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
>>>> +static int virtnet_build_xsk_buff_mrg(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>>> + struct receive_queue *rq,
>>>> + u32 num_buf,
>>>> + struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>>>> + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct sk_buff *curr_skb;
>>>> - struct xdp_buff *xdp;
>>>> - u32 len, truesize;
>>>> - struct page *page;
>>>> + unsigned int len;
>>>> void *buf;
>>>>
>>>> - curr_skb = head_skb;
>>>> + if (num_buf < 2)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + while (num_buf > 1) {
>>>> + struct xdp_buff *new_xdp;
>>>>
>>>> - while (--num_buf) {
>>>> buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len);
>>>> - if (unlikely(!buf)) {
>>>> - pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers out of %d missing\n",
>>>> - vi->dev->name, num_buf,
>>>> - virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev,
>>>> - hdr->num_buffers));
>>>> + if (!unlikely(buf)) {
>>>> + pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers missing\n",
>>>> + vi->dev->name, num_buf);
>>>> DEV_STATS_INC(vi->dev, rx_length_errors);
>>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> - u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes, len);
>>>> -
>>>> - xdp = buf_to_xdp(vi, rq, buf, len);
>>>> - if (!xdp)
>>>> - goto err;
>>>> -
>>>> - buf = napi_alloc_frag(len);
>>>> - if (!buf) {
>>>> - xsk_buff_free(xdp);
>>>> - goto err;
>>>> + return -1;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - memcpy(buf, xdp->data - vi->hdr_len, len);
>>>> -
>>>> - xsk_buff_free(xdp);
>>>> + new_xdp = buf_to_xdp(vi, rq, buf, len);
>>>> + if (!new_xdp)
>>>> + goto drop_bufs;
>>>>
>>>> - page = virt_to_page(buf);
>>>> + /* In virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk(), we ask the host to fill from
>>>> + * xdp->data - vi->hdr_len with both virtio_net_hdr and data.
>>>> + * However, only the first packet has the virtio_net_hdr, the
>>>> + * following ones do not. So we need to adjust the following
>>> Typo here.
>> I'm sorry, could you clarify which word contains the typo?
>>
>>>> + * packets' data pointer to the correct place.
>>>> + */
>>> I wonder what happens if we don't use this trick? I meant we don't
>>> reuse the header room for the virtio-net header. This seems to be fine
>>> for a mergeable buffer and can help to reduce the trick.
>> I don't think using the header room for virtio-net header creates this
>> case handling. In my opinion, it comes from the slightly difference in
>> the recvbuf between single buffer and multi-buffer. When we have n
>> single-buffer packets, each buffer will have its own virtio-net header.
>> But when we have 1 multi-buffer packet (which spans across n buffers),
>> only the first buffer has virtio-net header, the following buffers do not.
>>
>> There 2 important pointers here. The pointer we announce to the vhost
>> side to fill the data, let's call it announced_addr, and xdp_buff->data
>> which is expected to point the the start of Ethernet frame. Currently,
>>
>> announced_addr = xdp_buff->data - hdr_len
>>
>> The host side will write the virtio-net header to announced_addr then
>> the Ethernet frame's data in the first buffer. In case of multi-buffer
>> packet, in the following buffers, host side writes the Ethernet frame's
>> data to the announced_addr no virtio-net header. So in the virtio-net,
>> we need to subtract xdp_buff->data, otherwise, we lose some Ethernet
>> frame's data.
>>
>> I think a slightly better solution is that we set announced_addr =
>> xdp_buff->data then we only need to xdp_buff->data += hdr_len for the
>> first buffer and do need to adjust xdp_buff->data of the following buffers.
> Exactly my point.
>
>>>> + new_xdp->data -= vi->hdr_len;
>>>> + new_xdp->data_end = new_xdp->data + len;
>>>>
>>>> - truesize = len;
>>>> + if (!xsk_buff_add_frag(xdp, new_xdp))
>>>> + goto drop_bufs;
>>>>
>>>> - curr_skb = virtnet_skb_append_frag(head_skb, curr_skb, page,
>>>> - buf, len, truesize);
>>>> - if (!curr_skb) {
>>>> - put_page(page);
>>>> - goto err;
>>>> - }
>>>> + num_buf--;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>> -err:
>>>> +drop_bufs:
>>>> xsk_drop_follow_bufs(vi->dev, rq, num_buf, stats);
>>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>>> + return -1;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static struct sk_buff *virtnet_receive_xsk_merge(struct net_device *dev, struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>>> @@ -1307,23 +1297,42 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtnet_receive_xsk_merge(struct net_device *dev, struct
>>>> num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
>>>>
>>>> ret = XDP_PASS;
>>>> + if (virtnet_build_xsk_buff_mrg(vi, rq, num_buf, xdp, stats))
>>>> + goto drop;
>>>> +
>>>> rcu_read_lock();
>>>> prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
>>>> - /* TODO: support multi buffer. */
>>>> - if (prog && num_buf == 1)
>>>> - ret = virtnet_xdp_handler(prog, xdp, dev, xdp_xmit, stats);
>>> Without this patch it looks like we had a bug:
>>>
>>> ret = XDP_PASS;
>>> rcu_read_lock();
>>> prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
>>> /* TODO: support multi buffer. */
>>> if (prog && num_buf == 1)
>>> ret = virtnet_xdp_handler(prog, xdp, dev, xdp_xmit, stats);
>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>
>>> This implies if num_buf is greater than 1, we will assume XDP_PASS?
>> Yes, I think XDP_DROP should be returned in that case.
> Care to post a patch and cc stable?
Okay, I'll submit a patch shortly.
Thanks,
Quang Minh.
>
>>>> + if (prog) {
>>>> + /* We are in zerocopy mode so we cannot copy the multi-buffer
>>>> + * xdp buff to a single linear xdp buff. If we do so, in case
>>>> + * the BPF program decides to redirect to a XDP socket (XSK),
>>>> + * it will trigger the zerocopy receive logic in XDP socket.
>>>> + * The receive logic thinks it receives zerocopy buffer while
>>>> + * in fact, it is the copy one and everything is messed up.
>>>> + * So just drop the packet here if we have a multi-buffer xdp
>>>> + * buff and the BPF program does not support it.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp) && !prog->aux->xdp_has_frags)
>>>> + ret = XDP_DROP;
>>> Could we move the check before trying to build a multi-buffer XDP buff?
>> Yes, I'll fix this in next version.
>>
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = virtnet_xdp_handler(prog, xdp, dev, xdp_xmit,
>>>> + stats);
>>>> + }
>>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>>
>>>> switch (ret) {
>>>> case XDP_PASS:
>>>> - skb = xsk_construct_skb(rq, xdp);
>>>> + skb = xdp_build_skb_from_zc(xdp);
>>> Is this better to make this change a separate patch?
>> Okay, I'll create a separate patch to convert the current XDP_PASS
>> handler to use xdp_build_skb_from_zc helper.
> That would be better.
>
>>>> if (!skb)
>>>> - goto drop_bufs;
>>>> + break;
>>>>
>>>> - if (xsk_append_merge_buffer(vi, rq, skb, num_buf, hdr, stats)) {
>>>> - dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>>>> - goto drop;
>>>> - }
>>>> + /* Later, in virtnet_receive_done(), eth_type_trans()
>>>> + * is called. However, in xdp_build_skb_from_zc(), it is called
>>>> + * already. As a result, we need to reset the data to before
>>>> + * the mac header so that the later call in
>>>> + * virtnet_receive_done() works correctly.
>>>> + */
>>>> + skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
>>>>
>>>> return skb;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1332,14 +1341,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtnet_receive_xsk_merge(struct net_device *dev, struct
>>>> return NULL;
>>>>
>>>> default:
>>>> - /* drop packet */
>>>> - xsk_buff_free(xdp);
>>>> + break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -drop_bufs:
>>>> - xsk_drop_follow_bufs(dev, rq, num_buf, stats);
>>>> -
>>>> drop:
>>>> + xsk_buff_free(xdp);
>>>> u64_stats_inc(&stats->drops);
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1396,6 +1402,8 @@ static int virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> len = xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size(pool) + vi->hdr_len;
>>>> + /* Reserve some space for skb_shared_info */
>>>> + len -= SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
>>>> /* Use the part of XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM as the virtnet hdr space.
>>>> @@ -6734,6 +6742,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>> dev->netdev_ops = &virtnet_netdev;
>>>> dev->stat_ops = &virtnet_stat_ops;
>>>> dev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
>>>> + dev->xdp_zc_max_segs = VIRTNET_MAX_ZC_SEGS;
>>>>
>>>> dev->ethtool_ops = &virtnet_ethtool_ops;
>>>> SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &vdev->dev);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
> Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists