[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3d584fe-6297-403d-84f3-397a0fe459c5@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:58:19 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests/mm: Report unique test names for each
cow test
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 04:15:42PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 03.06.25 15:21, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > } else {
> > > > - ksft_test_result_fail("Leak from parent into child\n");
> > > Same here and in other cases below (I probably didn't catch all).
> > > We should log that somehow to indicate what exactly is going wrong, likely
> > > using ksft_print_msg().
> > Can you send a patch with the logging that you think would be clear
> > please?
> > I dropped these because they just seemed to be reporting the> overall
> point of the test, unlike the cases where we ran into some error
> > during the setup and didn't actually manage to perform the test we were
> > trying to do. Perhaps the tests should be renamed.
> ksft_print_msg("Leak from parent into child");
Can you send a patch showing when/where you want this printing please?
Like I said I suspect the test name is just unclear here...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists