[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK+owojFg+A-_akaEO5wn=ghQpHBEvtc25bFp9qJX-vHh6SuHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:01:38 +0200
From: Stefano Radaelli <stefano.radaelli21@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, othacehe@....org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [v2] arm64: dts: freescale: imx93-var-som: update eqos support
for MaxLinear PHY
Hi Fabio,
Good catch on both points, you're absolutely right.
I'll update the subject line to include "PATCH" and fix the incorrect reference
to the Murata chip (should have been ADIN1300BCPZ, of course).
Thanks again for the careful review!
Best Regards,
Stefano
Il giorno mer 4 giu 2025 alle ore 18:44 Fabio Estevam
<festevam@...il.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Nitpik: The subject line of your path should be:
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ....
>
> and not only
>
> Subject: [v2] rm64: dts: ....
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:36 PM Stefano Radaelli
> <stefano.radaelli21@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Variscite has updated the Ethernet PHY on the VAR-SOM-MX93 from the
> > Murata CYW43353 to the MaxLinear MXL86110, as documented in the
>
> Murata CYW43353 is a Wifi chip, not an Ethernet PHY.
>
> I think you meant:
>
> "from the ADIN1300BCPZ to the MaxLinear MXL86110"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists