[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <egtsvxsfc5c2s4hrwucsqk3s5dv7xsi6ghrnf6jd3mvf3zvskb@z7hvehbd33t5>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:01:02 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...lbox.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779g3: Describe split
PCIe clock on V4H Sparrow Hawk
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:24:17AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Sat, 31 May 2025 at 00:55, Marek Vasut
> <marek.vasut+renesas@...lbox.org> wrote:
> > The V4H Sparrow Hawk board supplies PCIe controller input clock and PCIe
> > bus clock from separate outputs of Renesas 9FGV0441 clock generator chip.
> > Describe this split bus configuration in the board DT. The topology looks
> > as follows:
> >
> > ____________ _____________
> > | R-Car PCIe | | PCIe device |
> > | | | |
> > | PCIe RX<|==================|>PCIe TX |
> > | PCIe TX<|==================|>PCIe RX |
> > | | | |
> > | PCIe CLK<|======.. ..======|>PCIe CLK |
> > '------------' || || '-------------'
> > || ||
> > ____________ || ||
> > | 9FGV0441 | || ||
> > | | || ||
> > | CLK DIF0<|======'' ||
> > | CLK DIF1<|==========''
> > | CLK DIF2<|
> > | CLK DIF3<|
> > '------------'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...lbox.org>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > V2: Use pciec0_rp/pciec1_rp phandles to refer to root port moved to core r8a779g0.dtsi
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> I understand this has a hard dependency on [PATCH v2 1/3] (and on
> enabling CONFIG_PCI_PWRCTRL_SLOT), so I cannot apply this before that
> patch is upstream?
>
TBH, this patch is describing the binding properly. So even though the driver
change is necessary to make the device functional, I don't see it as a hard
dependency. But since people care about functionality, if both driver and DTS
changes go into the same release, it should be fine IMO.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists