linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 03/16] CXL/AER: Introduce kfifo for forwarding CXL errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d00a0448-dd2b-453d-863f-914909f76abc@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 14:21:30 -0500
From: "Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@....com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com, dave@...olabs.net,
 jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
 alison.schofield@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
 dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de,
 ming.li@...omail.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
 Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com, kobayashi.da-06@...itsu.com,
 yanfei.xu@...el.com, rrichter@....com, peterz@...radead.org, colyli@...e.de,
 uaisheng.ye@...el.com, fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com,
 ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, yazen.ghannam@....com,
 linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/16] CXL/AER: Introduce kfifo for forwarding CXL
 errors



On 6/4/2025 12:24 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 09:37:02AM -0500, Bowman, Terry wrote:
>>
>> On 6/4/2025 1:01 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Terry Bowman wrote:
>>>> +static struct work_struct cxl_prot_err_work;
>>>> +static DECLARE_WORK(cxl_prot_err_work, cxl_prot_err_work_fn);
>>>> +
>>>>  int cxl_ras_init(void)
>>>>  {
>>>> -	return cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>>>> +	int rc;
>>>> +
>>>> +	rc = cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>>>> +	if (rc)
>>>> +		pr_err("Failed to register CPER AER kfifo (%x)", rc);
>>> This shouldn't return rc;?
>> This was implemented to allow for native CXL handling initialization even if
>> FW-first (CPER) initialization fails. This can be changed to return rc.
> No no.  I'm fine with it either way so long as it's deliberate.  But
> maybe add a comment if we can continue.
>
> 	rc = cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
> 	if (rc) {
> 		pr_err("Failed to register CPER AER kfifo (%x)", rc);
> 		/* Continuing regardless.  Thanks. */
> 	}
>
> 	rc = cxl_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_prot_err_work);
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Good idea. I made the change as you recommended.

Terry