linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] Sched: Scheduler time slice extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250604192327.sVjt6c4u@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 21:23:27 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"kprateek.nayak@....com" <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
	"vineethr@...ux.ibm.com" <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] Sched: Scheduler time slice extension

On 2025-06-04 17:29:44 [+0000], Prakash Sangappa wrote:
> Don’t know if there were benefits mentioned when RT tasks are involved.
> 
> I had shared some benchmark results in this thread showing benefit of using scheduler time extension.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241113000126.967713-1-prakash.sangappa@oracle.com/
> The workload did not include RT tasks.

I don't question the mechanism/ approach. I just don't want RT tasks
delayed.

> -Prakash

Sebastian