[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083B072C126CEBD6C2D52BAFC6CA@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 22:47:03 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, "Chatre,
Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, "Wieczor-Retman, Maciej"
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave
Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/4 UPDATED] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitor event
descriptions
> Sorry, I just picked a random header file there....ignore that part but
> my real suggestion was to reduce the lines when declaring "struct
> mon_evt mon_event_all[]" with above #define so more events can fit in
> one screen when viewing the code.
The macro can go into fs/resctrl/monitor.c ... it isn’t needed in any
other file.
Sounds like a good idea.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists