linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Enable EINJv2 Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEDaWWHKrM5hUt9M@agluck-desk3>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 16:44:25 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Zaid Alali <zaidal@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, bp@...en8.de,
	kees@...nel.org, gustavoars@...nel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
	sudeep.holla@....com, u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, ira.weiny@...el.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, sthanneeru.opensrc@...ron.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Benjamin.Cheatham@....com,
	dave.jiang@...el.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Enable EINJv2 Support

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 03:37:57PM -0700, Zaid Alali wrote:
> The goal of this update is to allow the driver to simultaneously
> support EINJ and EINJv2. The implementation follows ACPI 6.6
> specs[1] that enables the driver to discover system capabilities
> through GET_ERROR_TYPE.
> 
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.6/18_Platform_Error_Interfaces.html#error-injection [1]
> 
> V8:
> 	*Update UI to use single value files for component array.
> 	*Update links to point to recent ACPI 6.6 spec release.
> 	*Updated commit messages and documentation patch.
> 	*Dropped the first two patches as they were merged via
> 	 ACPICA project.

Some of the Signed-off-by tags in this series are wrong. Partially
my fault for an offline exchange of patches with Zaid to get this
series cleaned up.

1	Could have a Reviewed-by: Tony Luck instead of Signed-off
2	Could have a Reviewed-by: Tony Luck instead of Signed-off
3	Could have a Reviewed-by: Tony Luck instead of Signed-off
4	I rewrote the commit message, could have a Reviewed-by: Tony Luck instead of Signed-off
5	My patch, but Zaid forwarded it, so it should have his Signed-off after mine
6	Zaid's Signed-off should be after my Sign/Co-developed
7	Zaid's Signed-off should be after my Sign/Co-developed

Apart from that, all seems good in this version.

-Tony