[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEAJlbJ9FP3e0DEh@hyeyoo>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:53:41 +0900
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, slab: restore NUMA policy support for large
kmalloc
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 01:02:12PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The slab allocator observes the task's NUMA policy in various places
> such as allocating slab pages. Large kmalloc() allocations used to do
> that too, until an unintended change by c4cab557521a ("mm/slab_common:
> cleanup kmalloc_large()") resulted in ignoring mempolicy and just
> preferring the local node. Restore the NUMA policy support.
>
> Fixes: c4cab557521a ("mm/slab_common: cleanup kmalloc_large()")
Oops, I broke it unintentionally :(
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Thanks for fixing!
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
> mm/slub.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index dc9e729e1d269b5d362cb5bc44f824640ffd00f3..11356c701f9f857a2e8cf40bf963ac3abdb5e010 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4282,7 +4282,12 @@ static void *___kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
> flags = kmalloc_fix_flags(flags);
>
> flags |= __GFP_COMP;
> - folio = (struct folio *)alloc_pages_node_noprof(node, flags, order);
> +
> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + folio = (struct folio *)alloc_pages_noprof(flags, order);
> + else
> + folio = (struct folio *)__alloc_pages_noprof(flags, order, node, NULL);
> +
> if (folio) {
> ptr = folio_address(folio);
> lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
>
> --
> 2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists