[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <793ae4a30ab15d0993ce9152ce91b6b98a05b1a5.camel@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 09:24:12 +0000
From: Siddh Raman Pant <siddh.raman.pant@...cle.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2025-21991: x86/microcode/AMD: Fix out-of-bounds on systems
with CPU-less NUMA nodes
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:51:58 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
>
> x86/microcode/AMD: Fix out-of-bounds on systems with CPU-less NUMA nodes
>
> [...]
>
> This does not have any security implications since flashing microcode is
> a privileged operation but I believe this has reliability implications by
> potentially corrupting memory while flashing a microcode update.
If it is explicitly specified that this does not have any security
implication, why is this a CVE?
IMO this should be rejected.
Thanks,
Siddh
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists