[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB8510DDEC9525F0D6DA6BA7DD886CA@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:32:57 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Clark Wang
<xiaoning.wang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Netdev
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] net: enetc: fix the netc-lib driver build dependency
> > Thanks, this seems to be the best proposal thus far. IMO it is also
> > easy to maintain and it also fully satisfies the imposed requirements.
> > I checked that when FSL_ENETC_CORE goes to m, NXP_NETC_LIB also goes
> > to m, and when it remains y, the latter also remains y. Note,
> > FSL_ENETC_CORE only goes to m when all its selecters are m. More
> > importantly, when NXP_ENETC4=n, NXP_NETC_LIB is also n. The drivers
> > seem to build in all cases.
> >
> > Will you send a patch with this proposal, or should Wei do it with a
> > Suggested-by?
>
> I'd prefer Wei to send it as a tested patch with my Suggested-by.
> I've also tested this version overnight on my randconfig build system.
>
Thanks, I will improve the solution.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists