[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250604114459.GA29325@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 04:44:59 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>,
Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Chris Oo <cho@...rosoft.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/acpi: Move acpi_wakeup_cpu() and helpers to
smpwakeup.c
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:12:53AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 2:18 AM Ricardo Neri
> <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The bootstrap processor uses acpi_wakeup_cpu() to indicate to firmware that
> > it wants to boot a secondary CPU using a mailbox as described in the
> > Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure of the ACPI specification.
> >
> > The platform firmware may implement the mailbox as described in the ACPI
> > specification but enumerate it using a DeviceTree graph. An example of
> > this is OpenHCL paravisor.
> >
> > Move the code used to setup and use the mailbox for CPU wakeup out of the
> > ACPI directory into a new smpwakeup.c file that both ACPI and DeviceTree
> > can use.
> >
> > No functional changes are intended.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Create a new file smpwakeup.c instead of relocating it to smpboot.c.
> > (Rafael)
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Only move to smpboot.c the portions of the code that configure and
> > use the mailbox. This also resolved the compile warnings about unused
> > functions that Michael Kelley reported.
> > - Edited the commit message for clarity.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - None.
> > ---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 7 ++++
> > arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/madt_wakeup.c | 76 ----------------------------------
> > arch/x86/kernel/smpwakeup.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index cb0f4af31789..82147edb355a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -1113,6 +1113,13 @@ config X86_LOCAL_APIC
> > depends on X86_64 || SMP || X86_UP_APIC || PCI_MSI
> > select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> >
> > +config X86_MAILBOX_WAKEUP
> > + def_bool y
> > + depends on OF || ACPI_MADT_WAKEUP
>
> At this point the dependency on OF is premature. IMV it should be
> added in a later patch.
I see your point. Sure, I will the dependency in a later patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists