[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc2b9e86-29f7-406e-a7c5-3f949f3999db@ghiti.fr>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:55:27 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] riscv: process: use unsigned int instead of
unsigned long for put_user()
Hi Clément,
On 6/2/25 21:39, Clément Léger wrote:
> The specification of prctl() for GET_UNALIGN_CTL states that the value is
> returned in an unsigned int * address passed as an unsigned long. Change
> the type to match that and avoid an unaligned access as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> index 15d8f75902f8..9ee6d816b98b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int get_unalign_ctl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long adr)
> if (!unaligned_ctl_available())
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return put_user(tsk->thread.align_ctl, (unsigned long __user *)adr);
> + return put_user(tsk->thread.align_ctl, (unsigned int __user *)adr);
> }
>
> void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists