[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1aa7c368-c37f-4b00-876c-dcf51a523c42@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 15:46:15 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...hat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, donettom@...ux.ibm.com, aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com,
sj@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix the inaccurate memory statistics issue for users
On 6/4/25 14:46, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> Baolin, please run stress-ng command that stresses minor anon page
>> faults in multiple threads and then run multiple bash scripts which cat
>> /proc/pidof(stress-ng)/status. That should be how much the stress-ng
>> process is impacted by the parallel status readers versus without them.
>
> Sure. Thanks Shakeel. I run the stress-ng with the 'stress-ng --fault 32
> --perf -t 1m' command, while simultaneously running the following
> scripts to read the /proc/pidof(stress-ng)/status for each thread.
How many of those scripts?
> From the following data, I did not observe any obvious impact of this
> patch on the stress-ng tests when repeatedly reading the
> /proc/pidof(stress-ng)/status.
>
> w/o patch
> stress-ng: info: [6891] 3,993,235,331,584 CPU Cycles
> 59.767 B/sec
> stress-ng: info: [6891] 1,472,101,565,760 Instructions
> 22.033 B/sec (0.369 instr. per cycle)
> stress-ng: info: [6891] 36,287,456 Page Faults Total
> 0.543 M/sec
> stress-ng: info: [6891] 36,287,456 Page Faults Minor
> 0.543 M/sec
>
> w/ patch
> stress-ng: info: [6872] 4,018,592,975,968 CPU Cycles
> 60.177 B/sec
> stress-ng: info: [6872] 1,484,856,150,976 Instructions
> 22.235 B/sec (0.369 instr. per cycle)
> stress-ng: info: [6872] 36,547,456 Page Faults Total
> 0.547 M/sec
> stress-ng: info: [6872] 36,547,456 Page Faults Minor
> 0.547 M/sec
>
> =========================
> #!/bin/bash
>
> # Get the PIDs of stress-ng processes
> PIDS=$(pgrep stress-ng)
>
> # Loop through each PID and monitor /proc/[pid]/status
> for PID in $PIDS; do
> while true; do
> cat /proc/$PID/status
> usleep 100000
Hm but this limits the reading to 10 per second? If we want to simulate an
adversary process, it should be without the sleeps I think?
> done &
> done
Powered by blists - more mailing lists